INSIDE THE ISSUES (View all posts) » NH Officials Sign Up for Lawsuit by Pulling Plug on Bible Marquee

NH Officials Sign Up for Lawsuit by Pulling Plug on Bible Marquee

Signs for JesusCall it a sign of the times: the town leaders of Chichester, New Hampshire moved recently to short-circuit plans by a local non-profit to put up a roadside electronic message sign on its own private property.

Signs for Jesus wanted to display Bible verses on the six-by-four-foot sign – a different verse every day – and since a number of other businesses along the same public road flash regular electronic messages of their own, the idea seemed harmless enough. In fact, the previous owner of the property, a woodworking shop, had maintained a non-electronic sign of similar size in virtually the same spot.

But the town planning board took a dim view of this particular sign, which some worried would flash “objectionable” Scriptures. One board member expressed concern that, because the sign would communicate a message, it might be more distracting to drivers than comparable signs that “just inform drivers about the price of gas.”

“If motorist reaction is a serious concern, the town would be better off banning displays of the current price of gas,” says ADF Senior Counsel Joseph Infranco. Nevertheless, he adds, “Town officials may not single out religious content over concerns on how passing motorists will react. Christian organizations shouldn’t be censored by a city’s zoning officials because the messages of their street signs happen to be religious in nature.”

After numerous appeals, planning officials eventually approved the sign unanimously – but then, on February 9, denied site plan approval in a 4-3 decision, still citing concerns that lit-up Bible verses might create a traffic hazard by distracting drivers on a busy road.

With that in mind, ADF allied attorney Michael J. Tierney of Manchester (one of nearly 1,900 attorneys in the ADF alliance) filed a lawsuit on March 14 against Chichester officials, citing their violation of the U.S. Constitution and the federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Person Act, which prohibits the government from singling out nonprofit religious organizations for discrimination in zoning matters.

Please be in prayer for this case, and for so many like it all over the country, where local officials are moving more and more aggressively to inhibit the witness and community involvement of churches, ministries, and Christian non-profits.

Author: Alan Sears

 

 

  • JD

    Shame on Chichester, New Hampshire officials. This type of “censorship” is exactly what the U.S. Constitution aims to protect. People should know that by now.

  • Kenneth Johnson

    The Constitution allows for the free exercise of religion; therefore, the town cannot ban the sign for religious reasons.

    If the sign is indeed a traffic hazard and the content has nothing to do with town’s decision, then they have the right to ban it.

  • http://yahoo Cindy Nichol

    My reply is very short, if someone wanted to put a bar sign or a sign for a Topless Bar It wouldn’t surprise me it no one objected. It is a privately owned property so it needs to be left alone. I look and read signs in front of churches all the time and I have never wrecked.

  • Ben W

    I don’t think that anyone that can be distracted by a single sentence has the capacity to drive.

  • http://monex.to/wiki/E._Keith_Owens Brookside Institute

    But that wasnt the end of it.I read the part about the town prohibiting signage and thought OK we wont have any more people holding signs said Tammy Roberts a veteran tax preparer who has owned Carys Liberty Tax Service on Southeast Maynard Road since July. Well just have them out on the street waving.But officials with the towns zoning compliance board determined the icons themselves were in violation of the towns sign laws which prohibit illegal attention grabbing devices in front of businesses.This week the Maynard Road location received two certified letters informing the business it was being fined 600.We were fined 100 for the first offense and slapped with a 500 fine for the second one Roberts said.Try as she might Roberts said she cant figure out the towns reasoning.Lady Liberty as illegal? You cant be distracting drivers as they drive.The issue might not be over.Two Lady Libertys and an Uncle Sam were in front of the business Friday — sans signs — waving at motorists Roberts said.Bad idea.He Lloyd came in today Friday and threatened me with a 1 000 fine Roberts said.Lloyd said he would not issue more citations until he gets approval from a supervisor.The zoning officer told Roberts he had warned Lady Liberty and Uncle Sam themselves Jan.